9/11 Truth Science
For all those who say 9/11 truth contains no science and is simply full of paranoid conspiracy stories, I have a great big present for you.
The informative site 9/11 Research has posted a great article entitled "The Jet Fuel: how hot did it heat the World Trade Center?".
I encourage you to read it, but if you're not a chemist or physicst or mathemetician, don't expect to follow it with ease.
It's hard science, full of equations that endeavor to demonstrate that the jet fuel in those planes could not possibly have heated the steel of the WTC to its weakening point (1100 degrees F).
It uses FEMA's report for its premise, and it concludes this way: We have assumed that the entire 3,500 gallons of jet fuel was confined to just one floor of the World Trade Center, that the jet fuel burnt with perfect efficency, that no hot gases left this floor, that no heat escaped this floor by conduction and that the steel and concrete had an unlimited amount of time to absorb all the heat.
Then it is impossible that the jet fuel, by itself, raised the temperature of this floor more than 257° C (495° F).
495 is not even close to the temperature needed to weaken steel.
This is another strong link in the chain we are creating—a chain of convincing proof that the official story simply doesn't make sense.
I wonder how those who support the official story will react?
The informative site 9/11 Research has posted a great article entitled "The Jet Fuel: how hot did it heat the World Trade Center?".
I encourage you to read it, but if you're not a chemist or physicst or mathemetician, don't expect to follow it with ease.
It's hard science, full of equations that endeavor to demonstrate that the jet fuel in those planes could not possibly have heated the steel of the WTC to its weakening point (1100 degrees F).
It uses FEMA's report for its premise, and it concludes this way: We have assumed that the entire 3,500 gallons of jet fuel was confined to just one floor of the World Trade Center, that the jet fuel burnt with perfect efficency, that no hot gases left this floor, that no heat escaped this floor by conduction and that the steel and concrete had an unlimited amount of time to absorb all the heat.
Then it is impossible that the jet fuel, by itself, raised the temperature of this floor more than 257° C (495° F).
495 is not even close to the temperature needed to weaken steel.
This is another strong link in the chain we are creating—a chain of convincing proof that the official story simply doesn't make sense.
I wonder how those who support the official story will react?
Comments