MIT Engineer Debunks Official "Weakened by Fire" Story
MIT engineer Jeff King refutes a key component of the official 9/11 story: that the steel was weakened by the jet fuel fire and that weakening precipitated universal collapse.
The video is worth taking a look at.
Some of the key points that King hits are:
—the black smoke of the tower fires usually indicates an oxygen-poor, cool burning fire
—the original FEMA report admits that most of the kerosene would have burned off in the first few minutes
—the core should not have collapsed; it was designed to specifically not act like a chimney
—he cites multiple studies that all scientifically reject the pancake theory
—the physical evidence that could have been examined was largely destroyed
—the dust clouds could only have been caused by explosives (he likens them to volcanic eruptions in nature)
I'm doing my part to present evidence.
If you still don't have questions, I would like to know why.
The video is worth taking a look at.
Some of the key points that King hits are:
—the black smoke of the tower fires usually indicates an oxygen-poor, cool burning fire
—the original FEMA report admits that most of the kerosene would have burned off in the first few minutes
—the core should not have collapsed; it was designed to specifically not act like a chimney
—he cites multiple studies that all scientifically reject the pancake theory
—the physical evidence that could have been examined was largely destroyed
—the dust clouds could only have been caused by explosives (he likens them to volcanic eruptions in nature)
I'm doing my part to present evidence.
If you still don't have questions, I would like to know why.
Comments