Stanley Hilton claims George W. Bush authorized 9/11
Appearing on the Alex Jones show recently, Stanley Hilton, a former chief of staff for Bob Dole, made some shocking allegations about 9/11.
I'll use his words for mine could not say it any clearer:
Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject - how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35 years.
This is no crackpot conspiracy guy from an unknown blog; he worked as Bob Dole's senior advisor. He's well connected in Washington.
He continues his allegations:
The hijackers were U.S. undercover agents. They were double agents, paid by the FBI and the CIA to spy on Arab groups in this country. They were controlled. Their landlord was an FBI informant in San Diego and other places. And this was a direct, covert operation ordered, personally ordered by George W. Bush. Personally ordered. We have incriminating evidence, documents as well as witnesses, to this effect. It's not just incompetence - in spite of the fact that he is incompetent. The fact is he personally ordered this, knew about it. He, at one point, there were rehearsals of this. The reason why he appeared to be uninterested and nonchalant on September 11th - when those videos showed that Andrew Card whispered in his ear the [garbled] words about this he listened to kids reading the pet goat story, is that he thought this was another rehearsal. These people had dress-rehearsed this many times. He had seen simulated videos of this. In fact, he even made a Freudian slip a few months later at a California press conference when he said he had, quote, "seen on television the first plane attack the first tower." And that could not be possible because there was no video. What it was was the simulated video that he had gone over. So this was a personally government-ordered thing.
Once again, I am not asking to swallow his claims. Investigate for yourself.
Of course, we do need to ask this question: what would his motives be for lying? Certainly, he is burning bridges in Washington.
Some excerpts of the radio program are available here: prisonplanet.tv/audio/091204hilton.htm
I'll use his words for mine could not say it any clearer:
Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject - how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35 years.
This is no crackpot conspiracy guy from an unknown blog; he worked as Bob Dole's senior advisor. He's well connected in Washington.
He continues his allegations:
The hijackers were U.S. undercover agents. They were double agents, paid by the FBI and the CIA to spy on Arab groups in this country. They were controlled. Their landlord was an FBI informant in San Diego and other places. And this was a direct, covert operation ordered, personally ordered by George W. Bush. Personally ordered. We have incriminating evidence, documents as well as witnesses, to this effect. It's not just incompetence - in spite of the fact that he is incompetent. The fact is he personally ordered this, knew about it. He, at one point, there were rehearsals of this. The reason why he appeared to be uninterested and nonchalant on September 11th - when those videos showed that Andrew Card whispered in his ear the [garbled] words about this he listened to kids reading the pet goat story, is that he thought this was another rehearsal. These people had dress-rehearsed this many times. He had seen simulated videos of this. In fact, he even made a Freudian slip a few months later at a California press conference when he said he had, quote, "seen on television the first plane attack the first tower." And that could not be possible because there was no video. What it was was the simulated video that he had gone over. So this was a personally government-ordered thing.
Once again, I am not asking to swallow his claims. Investigate for yourself.
Of course, we do need to ask this question: what would his motives be for lying? Certainly, he is burning bridges in Washington.
Some excerpts of the radio program are available here: prisonplanet.tv/audio/091204hilton.htm
Ok, here is someone with some significant credentials making HUGE claims. Good start. Now, where are the "incriminating documents". Very disturbing that they are not available. And in response to your challenge, how do we investigate this particular item? Show us the docs!
Reply to this
I'm working on finding those documents.
Reply to this
On all your Stanly Hilton hype, please reconcile with the below:
You have the following on:
Stanley Hilton
. SH(inter: I did an interview with you, Alex (Jones who markets wacko world stuff), about a year and a half ago, and literally two weeks after that, I was contacted by the emissary of the chief judge of the federal court where I have the lawsuit. (San Francisco zoolu-land) And I was warned not to publicize it but to keep it quiet and threatened with discipline. And it remained quiet until a couple of months ago and then I got on the air on some programs and some publicity and July 1st, I was threatened directly by the chief judge here, threatened with court discipline. This particular judge has been circulating communiqués to the other federal judges(See below on Trott) seeking anything negative she can get against me to try and discipline me after I've been on the court here for 30 years with no disciplinary problems at all. This is suddenly happening. And her assistants who are on the committee of the court met with me on July 1st in Palo Alto, California, and threatened me directly. They handed me a copy of the lawsuit and said that the judge wants me to dismiss this. (it was toossd Soverign immuity, other groudns etc.)What's this? She doesn't like the content of it. This is politically incorrect. This is outside the norm. I said I represented more than 400 plaintiffs,(but the mass murders were in NYC),, how am I going to dismiss this case? And they threatened me directly and they said, "the next time you'll be disciplined." And also they've threatened me not to go public, etc. And this is just outrageous
Hilton went on the Alex Jones Air TX Radio show(Austin live), creating the impression he took depositions in his so called 911 FED suit. That was bull, just raw bull spread to America ), no such depositions were taken...Fed Judges on the 9th Circuit have manifestos about "the first to be guillotined", see right from 9th Circuit :
Shades of the days leading up to the French Revolution of 1789 when taxes were collected by a private concern called the "Ferme Generale," or "Tax Farm." The first to be guillotined in the Place de la Revolution during the incarnadine Reign of Terror were the hated private tax collectors who made a profit by collecting more from the public than the amount needed by the government. 1 One day, Inspector Fine uses the awesome power of the federal government to investigate you; the next, Mr. Fine uses the information he pries loose from you with that power to augment his bank account. Can anyone say when Inspector Fine wields the coercive tools of the government that he is also not working for himself? Dr. Jekyll one day, Mr. Hyde the next. Such an abuse could only cause the public to distrust government officials even more than the publi
Reply to this
I'm not really sure how to respond to this post because I am not sure what its point is.
As for calling my post on Stanley Hilton "hype", I think that is inaccurate. I was reporting what I read on the net.
If you don't buy what Hilton says, and I'm not sure I totally do, then so be it.
However, he should not be dismissed because his story differs from the mainstream story.
And if the poster is some agent of disinformation who is trying to discredit anything non-mainstream, then he needs to be much clearer in his criticisms.
Reply to this