In light of $4 gas...
RFK Jr. recently wrote an article in Vanity Fair which I think is worth reading. It outlines his ideas for what the next President should ideally do to ensure a more reasonable energy future for the US.
In the article, he doesn't talk about eliminating carbon-based energy, but finding cleaner and more efficient alternatives, using Sweden and Iceland as examples:
We know that nations that “decarbonize” their economies reap immediate rewards. Sweden announced in 2006 the phaseout of all fossil fuels (and nuclear energy) by 2020. In 1991 the Swedes enacted a carbon tax—now up to $150 a ton—and as a result thousands of entrepreneurs rushed to develop new ways of generating energy from wind, the sun, and the tides, and from woodchips, agricultural waste, and garbage. Growth rates climbed to upwards of three times those of the U.S.
Iceland was 80 percent dependent on imported coal and oil in the 1970s and was among the poorest economies in Europe. Today, Iceland is 100 percent energy-independent, with 90 percent of the nation’s homes heated by geothermal and its remaining electrical needs met by hydro. The International Monetary Fund now ranks Iceland the fourth most affluent nation on earth. The country, which previously had to beg for corporate investment, now has companies lined up to relocate there to take advantage of its low-cost clean energy.
The idea of energy self-sufficiency seems like a pipe dream to most Americans, but it can be achieved.
Take the example of Brazil, which uses its abundant sugar crop to produce ethanol, coupled with cars that can run on gasoline or ethanol.
RFK goes on to say this about the US:
The United States has far greater domestic energy resources than Iceland or Sweden does. We sit atop the second-largest geothermal resources in the world. The American Midwest is the Saudi Arabia of wind; indeed, North Dakota, Kansas, and Texas alone produce enough harnessable wind to meet all of the nation’s electricity demand. As for solar, according to a study in Scientific American, photovoltaic and solar-thermal installations across just 19 percent of the most barren desert land in the Southwest could supply nearly all of our nation’s electricity needs without any rooftop installation, even assuming every American owned a plug-in hybrid
RFK's arguments are compelling, but with our politicians so deeply in bed with corporate interests, can we ever see the investment needed to explore these alternatives?
Oil companies are experiencing record profits with no slowdown in site.
And I do not support a carbon tax like the one Sweden implemented.
Our only hope is to somehow shake the lockdown the oil money seems to have on our government.


Comments