Imploding America: Recent Comments

Comment on Stanley Hilton claims George W. Bush authorized 9/11

humphrey — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:12:49 GMT

I'm not really sure how to respond to this post because I am not sure what its point is.

As for calling my post on Stanley Hilton "hype", I think that is inaccurate. I was reporting what I read on the net.

If you don't buy what Hilton says, and I'm not sure I totally do, then so be it.

However, he should not be dismissed because his story differs from the mainstream story.

And if the poster is some agent of disinformation who is trying to discredit anything non-mainstream, then he needs to be much clearer in his criticisms.

Comment on Your cellphone can be used to track you

humphrey — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:10:21 GMT

I was just reporting on the study. I, too, already assumed cell phones can get traced if they are turned on.

What if it doesn't matter if they are turned on though? What if just carrying the thing identifies you?

As for tracing people, you're right, not many people warrant being traced. My daily activities, if truth be told, are fairly boring--work, coffee shop, supermarket, train station, et al. However, it does creep me out that someone most definitely can trace me if they wish.

One of the most horrifying movies I have seen in the last 15 years was the apparently forgotten Enemy of the State with Will Smith. Do you remember that one? Back then I thought it was frightening for what it implied; today I know it is frightening because it probably understates surveillance capabilities.

Comment on Your cellphone can be used to track you

96 leedsville — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:20:16 GMT

Old news. Nothing new about this. This technology has been used to help convict murderers - Scott Peterson comes to mind. If you want to be lost, turn your cell phone off. The benefits of this capability outweigh the negatives. If you don't want to be located, turn your phone off. Besides, who is really tracking this stuff unless it is proven later something happened?

Comment on Stanley Hilton claims George W. Bush authorized 9/11

Beamy Two — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:37:24 GMT

On all your Stanly Hilton hype, please reconcile with the below:
You have the following on:

Stanley Hilton:(so called classmate of Ken Starr, CA ESQ, and suer on 911 in CA)...who now claims he is in the cross hairs of the FED JUDGES in CA, and on their RADARS BIG TIME
. SH(inter: I did an interview with you, Alex (Jones who markets wacko world stuff), about a year and a half ago, and literally two weeks after that, I was contacted by the emissary of the chief judge of the federal court where I have the lawsuit. (San Francisco zoolu-land) And I was warned not to publicize it but to keep it quiet and threatened with discipline. And it remained quiet until a couple of months ago and then I got on the air on some programs and some publicity and July 1st, I was threatened directly by the chief judge here, threatened with court discipline. This particular judge has been circulating communiqués to the other federal judges(See below on Trott) seeking anything negative she can get against me to try and discipline me after I've been on the court here for 30 years with no disciplinary problems at all. This is suddenly happening. And her assistants who are on the committee of the court met with me on July 1st in Palo Alto, California, and threatened me directly. They handed me a copy of the lawsuit and said that the judge wants me to dismiss this. (it was toossd Soverign immuity, other groudns etc.)What's this? She doesn't like the content of it. This is politically incorrect. This is outside the norm. I said I represented more than 400 plaintiffs,(but the mass murders were in NYC),, how am I going to dismiss this case? And they threatened me directly and they said, "the next time you'll be disciplined." And also they've threatened me not to go public, etc. And this is just outrageous

Hilton went on the Alex Jones Air TX Radio show(Austin live), creating the impression he took depositions in his so called 911 FED suit. That was bull, just raw bull spread to America ), no such depositions were taken...Fed Judges on the 9th Circuit have manifestos about "the first to be guillotined", see right from 9th Circuit :
Shades of the days leading up to the French Revolution of 1789 when taxes were collected by a private concern called the "Ferme Generale," or "Tax Farm." The first to be guillotined in the Place de la Revolution during the incarnadine Reign of Terror were the hated private tax collectors who made a profit by collecting more from the public than the amount needed by the government. 1 One day, Inspector Fine uses the awesome power of the federal government to investigate you; the next, Mr. Fine uses the information he pries loose from you with that power to augment his bank account. Can anyone say when Inspector Fine wields the coercive tools of the government that he is also not working for himself? Dr. Jekyll one day, Mr. Hyde the next. Such an abuse could only cause the public to distrust government officials even more than the publi

Comment on Stanley Hilton claims George W. Bush authorized 9/11

humphrey — Sun, 25 May 2008 14:23:34 GMT

I'm working on finding those documents.

Comment on Stanley Hilton claims George W. Bush authorized 9/11

96 leed — Fri, 23 May 2008 19:19:58 GMT

Ok, here is someone with some significant credentials making HUGE claims. Good start. Now, where are the "incriminating documents". Very disturbing that they are not available. And in response to your challenge, how do we investigate this particular item? Show us the docs!

Comment on codex alimentarius

Ralph Fucetola JD — Fri, 23 May 2008 00:45:36 GMT

Thanks for providing the link to HealthFreedomUsa.org - we urge your readers to join our eAlert list and become a "mouse warrior for health freedom." With just a few clicks, you can make your voice heard with hundreds of thousands of others.

Just go to:
www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=187">http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=187

For Freedom,

Ralph Fucetola JD
NSF Trustee
www.healthfreedomusa.org
www.globalhealthfreedom.org

Comment on Have you heard of the Grace Commission?

humphrey — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:26:45 GMT

No one is saying the government is going unfunded. There are other sources of income besides personal income tax. There is corporate income tax, for one, which is perfectly legal according to the Constitution.

Just saying something can't be true doesn't make it not true.

The Grace Commission happened. Historical fact.

They reported that revenues from personal income tax go to repaying the debt accrued from borrowing money from the Fed. That they reported this is also historical fact.

You may disagree with their findings, but where is the proof or evidence?

I don't like a lot of what I report, but until I see some evidence, I have no reason to disbelieve this.

Comment on Have you heard of the Grace Commission?

96 Leedsville Dr — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:52:16 GMT

Interesting but ultimately it can't be true. First, the report is hardly definitive about what "waste" is and more importantly, its not possible for all the activities of the government to be unfunded. No matter how off track things might be, that is simply not possible.

Comment on Europe recommends decriminalization of file sharing

96 Leedsville Drive — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:22:09 GMT

You mention the NY times model. The big difference to me is that their "content" lasts for about a day. A song could last a lifetime. So I watch an ad to get my song. OK, then what? Can I forward along then to a 1000 of my friends who don't have to watch the ad? The model will undoubtedly change over time, but I can't stand the attitude of consumers who believe it is their right to have access to music for free. It is anti-capitalism. A song represents intellectual capital and its owner deserves to be compensated for its consumption. Any argument to this is ultimately a attempt to justify stealing. Would a different model be better, perhaps, but that doesn't justify stealing. This is like me saying that I don't think GM should charge for cars. They could build one that shows me ads at stop lights and I wouldn't have to pay for it. So I will steal one now while I wait for that business model to come about. Bullshit.